FjordvsFabFilter Pro-Q 4
- ✓About a fifth of the delay in Natural Phase1.27 ms vs 6.67 ms. Tighter monitoring while you track.
- ✓Cleaner automationZipper noise while a band sweeps: −118.4 dB vs −90.8 dB.
- ✓Less delay in Linear Phase too8,704 vs 9,216 samples.
- =Same distortion, same clean bypassBoth measure −89.1 dB THD+N, the floor of the test, and both pass audio through untouched with no bands set.
- =Textbook filter shapes on bothBoth follow the classic analog curves closely. FabFilter counts Q differently, so the same Q number gives a wider bell.
- !Where Pro-Q 4 has the edge: CPU in the phase modesNatural Phase 0.25% vs 0.79% of one core. In Zero Latency they tie at 0.09%. We're working on bringing Fjord's numbers down.

- Mix assistant. Fjord listens for about six seconds and suggests bands you accept or reject. It never changes the sound by itself.
- Analog character per band. Clean, Tape, Console, Germanium, Triode or Pentode on each band, with Drive. Pro-Q 4's character is one Clean, Subtle or Warm setting for the whole EQ.
- A standalone desktop app on Windows and Mac, as well as the plugin.
To be fair: Pro-Q 4 has things Fjord doesn't yet, like Dolby Atmos support up to 9.1.6 and EQ Sketch.




